Press Release.

“Maths and science are the guarantors of a bright future for Pakistan,” said Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, at an event he hosted along with the Pakistan Alliance for Maths and Science (PAMS), an informal collective of leading businesses and non-profit organisations dedicated to ensuring greater attention for maths and science in government schools across the country.

The event launched Volume I of the ‘Powering Pakistan for the 21st Century’ report, which has two more upcoming volumes. Volume I is titled, “How Maths and Science Powers Nations” and presents the case for maths and science as being essential to progress and prosperity of all nations. The event was attended by eminent scientists and researchers from around Pakistan, as well as leading companies and businesses.

Speaking at the launch, PM Sharif admitted that maths and science education has received insufficient attention by previous governments and spoke about the urgency of preparing for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, mentioning recent meetings with leading businessman and founder of, Mr. Jack Ma, and others at the World Economic Forum recently. He said he envisions a Pakistan that secures a future for young Pakistanis in which they are not just job-seekers, but inventors, entrepreneurs, enablers, disruptors, researchers, and global market leaders.

PM Sharif paid tribute to Pakistani engineers and scientists who are earning Pakistan a great name through their consistent hard work in the laboratories and research centers across the world. He credited them for Pakistan’s acknowledgment as the first non-European country to become an associate member of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN).

The event was attended by a strong representation of the scientific community and technology entrepreneurs with likes of Dr. Kulsoom Ghias of Aga Khan University, Dr. Sabieh Anwar of Lahore University of Management Science, and Jibran Saithi of QuBit among many others who unanimously endorsed the urgency of maths and science education in developing the cognitive skills needed for citizens to begin to assess their rights, and take advantage of the privileges they are afforded. Education advocate and popstar, Shehzad Roy also spoke about his adoption of government schools.

Dr Baela Raza Jamil, one of the members of the Pakistan Alliance for Maths and Science, said, “It is laudable that leading political figures are endorsing the urgency of maths and science for Pakistan,” and expressed hope that this ownership will extend to the provinces and be reflected in classrooms in all publicly-funded schools.

Volume II of “Powering Pakistan for the 21st Century” will offer a summary of the current situation of maths and science in Pakistan, and is expected to contain stark data about the level of learning outcomes in maths and science across the country.   Volume III will offer a roadmap for the future based on extensive consultations with scientists, mathematicians and academics in Pakistan and abroad.


Qureshi, Madeeha Gohar. 2012. “The Gender Differences in School Enrolment and Returns to Education in Pakistan”, Working Paper 2012:84, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.

Ashraf, Javed. 2011. “New Evidence On The Rates Of Return To Education In Pakistan”. Global Journal Of Business Research 5 (3): 113-120.

Abbas, Q. and J. Foreman-Peck. 2008. “The Mincer Human Capital Model In Pakistan: Implications For Education Policy”. South Asia Economic Journal 9 (2): 435-462.

Jamal, Haroon. 2015. “Private Returns to Education in Pakistan: A Statistical Investigation”, Working Paper no.15-2, Centre for Business and Economics Research, Institute of Business Administration.

Hyder, Asma. 2007. “Wage Differentials, Rate of Return to Education, and Occupational Wage Share in the Labour Market of Pakistan”, Working Paper 2007:17, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.

Aslam, Monazza. 2009. “Education Gender Gaps In Pakistan: Is The Labor Market To Blame?”.Economic Development And Cultural Change 57 (4): 747-784.

Nazli, Hina. 2004. “The Effect Of Education, Experience And Occupation On Earnings: Evidence From Pakistan”. Lahore Journal Of Economics 9 (2).,No.2.pdf#page=7

Nasir, Zafar Mueen, and Nazli, Hina. 2000. “Education and Earnings in Pakistan”, Working Paper 2007:177, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.

Alderman, Harold, Jere R. Behrman, David R. Ross, and Richard Sabot. 1996. “TheReturns To Endogenous Human Capital In Pakistan’s Rural Wage Labour Market”. Oxford Bulletin Of Economics And Statistics 58 (1): 29-55.

Behrman, Jere R., David Ross, and Richard Sabot. 2008. “Improving Quality Versus Increasing The Quantity Of Schooling: Estimates Of Rates Of Return From Rural Pakistan”. Journal Of Development Economics 85 (1-2): 94-104.

Psacharopoulos, George and Harry Anthony Patrinos. 2004. “Returns To Investment In Education: A Further Update”. Education Economics 12 (2): 111-134.

Hanushek, Eric.A and Ludgar Wößmann. 2007. Education Quality And Economic Growth. Washington: The World Bank.

Greenspan, Alan. 2000. “The Economic Importance of Improving Math-Science Education”. Speech, Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S House of Representatives.

Ahmed, Ayaz, and Ahsan, Henna. 2011. “Contribution of Services Sector in the Economy of Pakistan”, Working Paper 2011:79, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.

The Future Of Jobs: Employment, Skills And Workforce Strategy For The Fourth Industrial Revolution. 2016. Global Challenge Insight Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Measuring The Economic Benefits Of Mathematical Science Research In The UK. 2012. London: Deloitte.

Mathematical Sciences And Their Value For The Dutch Economy. 2014. Deloitte.

Medhora, Shalailah. 2015. “Science And Mathematics Boost Australia’s Economy By $145Bn A Year”. The Guardian.

Woo, Seokjin, Hyekyung Jung, Kyunghee Kim, and In-Yong Park. 2017. “Impact Of School For Improvement Policy In Korea: Evidence From A Regression Discontinuity Approach For Secondary Education”.

Yiannouka, Stavros. 2017. “The Secret Of Singapore’s Success In Education”.


Strong Performers And Successful Reformers In Education: Lessons From PISA For Japan. 2012. OECD Publishing.

“Eliminating Excess Defense Production”. 1997. Issues In Science And Technology.

Education Reporter,. 2001. “Math And Science Ed Called National Security ‘Crisis'”.

US Education Reform And National Security. 2017. Independent Task Force Report. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.

Levy, Harold and Jonathan Plucker. 2015. “Brains, Not Brawn”.